Pulse Oximetry Screening for Detecting Critical Congenital Heart Disease in Neonates.

Background Congenital heart disease (CHD) leads to significant morbidity in the neonatal population and is a crucial disorder behind early infancy death rates. Most have a critical congenital heart defect (Cr CHD) out of all the heart defects found in babies. A subgroup of cardiac anomalies needs surgery or catheter intervention during the neonatal period. Pulse oximetry is a good screening tool to detect cr CHD in neonates. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of pulse oximetry as a screening tool in a rural setting.  Methods This was a hospital-based prospective observational study. All consecutively born neonates whose parents consented to the study were subjected to pulse oximetry on all four limbs. Their peripheral arterial oxygen saturation was measured on days one, two, and three of life, starting four hours after birth. Babies detected with cyanotic congenital heart disease (CCHD) before birth are not a part of this study. All those with arterial oxygen saturation of less than 95% or a difference of saturation of more than 3% in the upper and lower limbs were considered suspects for Cr CHD and subjected to echocardiography. Results Among 5874 neonates studied, researchers found 164 babies to have significant hypoxemia on pulse oximetry, and 44 CHD were detected on echocardiography within the first three days of life (positive predictive value (PPV) 12.2%). The physician referred all of them to a higher center before further delay. Thirty-four babies with other congenital heart diseases were found using pulse oximetry examination. Also, 108 cases of hypoxemia due to other causes were found and monitored.  Conclusion Critical congenital heart diseases are a significant cause of death among neonates and require early diagnosis and emergent medical and surgical management. They are associated with hypoxemia, and this principle can be used to screen them using a pulse oximeter.

Prospective analysis of goal-directed fluid therapy vs conventional fluid therapy in perioperative outcome of composite resections of head and neck malignancy with free tissue transfer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Head and neck cancer surgeries with free tissue transfer are complex procedures, and fluid management can grossly affect the microvascular anastomosis. We hypothesise that intra-operative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is the key to administer fluid individualised to a patient's requirement. The aim of this study was to observe the role of GDFT in perioperative flap outcome and length of hospital stay. METHODS: A randomised prospective controlled study was performed in 106 patients undergoing composite resection of head and neck cancer with free tissue transfer. Patients in Group A received GDFT based on stroke volume variation whereas Group B received conventional fluid therapy intra-operatively. The endpoints of this study were total perioperative fluid, fluid boluses, vasopressor requirement, flap outcome and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test. RESULTS: The total intra-operative fluid given to both the groups was comparable but patients in Group A received more boluses and vasopressors compared to Group B during intra-operative period. The amount of fluid given in the first 24 hours post-operatively was significantly less in Group A (1807 + 476 ml) compared to Group B (2205 + 382 ml). Incidence of hypotension with tachycardia was observed in three patients in Group B and none in Group A. Poor flap outcome was observed in one patient in Group A versus four in Group B due to thrombosis. CONCLUSION: GDFT helps in early detection of fluid deficit and may avoid complications arising due to inadequate microvascular perfusion during the peri-operative period.

Head and neck radiotherapy - A risk factor for anaesthesia?

BACKGROUND: The aim was to study perioperative management in head and neck cancer, the commonest cancer in Indian men, after radiation therapy. Radiotherapy (RT) targets the tumour and the neck including the thyroid gland. RT induced physical effects (on the airway) and physiological effects (on the thyroid) impact perioperative care. Patients with RT-induced subclinical and mild clinical hypothyroidism are often asymptomatic. Cancer surgery is time-sensitive. Given that parenteral levothyroxine is not available, is a TSH of 15 acceptable for cancer surgery? METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary cancer centre. The records of elective surgery (72 patients) were scrutinised. Data on thyroid profile, airway, treatment of clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism, airway access, recovery and perioperative haemodynamic parameters were retrieved. Correlation of age, sex, RT, chemotherapy with hypothyroidism was done by Chi-square test. The perioperative course was studied. RESULTS: Hypothyroidism (subclinical and clinical) was diagnosed in 39% of patients. All were asymptomatic. There was a significant association between RT and hypothyroidism. In 50% of patients, we encountered a difficult airway. In subclinical hypothyroidism (TSH less than 15), after levothyroxine initiation, the course of anaesthesia, extubation, recovery and postoperative stay was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS: Hypothyroidism and difficult airways are a common sequel of RT. Selected cancer patients with subclinical hypothyroidism had a smooth perioperative course.